4.5 Article

The Acute Effects of Changes to AV Delay on BP and Stroke Volume Potential Implications for Design of Pacemaker Optimization Protocols

Journal

CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 122-U209

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964205

Keywords

physiology; BP; blood flow; pacemakers; hemodynamics

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Wellcome Trust [077049/Z/05/Z]
  3. Coronary Flow trust
  4. British Heart Foundation [PG/07/065, FS/05/068, FS/10/038]
  5. Foundation for Circulatory Health
  6. British Heart Foundation [FS/10/38/28268] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-The AV delay optimization of biventricular pacemakers (cardiac resynchronization therapy) may maximize hemodynamic benefit but consumes specialist time to conduct echocardiographically. Noninvasive BP monitoring is a potentially automatable alternative, but it is unknown whether it gives the same information and similar precision (signal/noise ratio). Moreover, the immediate BP increment on optimization has been reported to decay away: it is unclear whether this is the result of an (undesirable) decrease in stroke volume or a (desirable) compensatory relief of peripheral vasoconstriction. Methods and Results-To discriminate between these alternative mechanisms, we measured simultaneous beat-to-beat stroke volume (flow) using Doppler echocardiography, and BP using finger photoplethysmography, during and after AV delay changes from 40 to 120 ms in 19 subjects with cardiac pacemakers. BP and stroke volume both increased immediately (P < 0.001, within 1 heartbeat). BP showed a clear decline a few seconds later (average rate, -0.65 mm Hg/beat; r = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]); in contrast, stroke volume did not decline (P = 0.87). The immediate BP increment correlated strongly with the stroke volume increment (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). The signal/noise ratio was 3-fold better for BP than stroke volume (6.8 +/- 3.5 versus 2.3 +/- 1.4; P < 0.001). Conclusions-Improving AV delay immediately increases BP, but the effect begins to decay within a few seconds. Reassuringly, this is because of compensatory vasodilatation rather than reduction in cardiac function. Pacemaker optimization will never be reliable unless there is an adequate signal/noise ratio. Using BP rather than Doppler minimizes noise. The early phase (before vascular compensation) has the richest signal lode. (Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:122-130.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available