4.7 Article

Cardiac-Specific YAP Activation Improves Cardiac Function and Survival in an Experimental Murine MI Model

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 354-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303632

Keywords

heart failure; myocardial infarction; regeneration; survival

Funding

  1. American Heart Association (AHA)
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL116461, HL100401]
  3. AHA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Yes-associated protein (YAP), the terminal effector of the Hippo signaling pathway, is crucial for regulating embryonic cardiomyocyte proliferation. Objective: We hypothesized that YAP activation after myocardial infarction (MI) would preserve cardiac function and improve survival. Methods and Results: We used a cardiac-specific, inducible expression system to activate YAP in adult mouse heart. Activation of YAP in adult heart promoted cardiomyocyte proliferation and did not deleteriously affect heart function. Furthermore, YAP activation after MI preserved heart function and reduced infarct size. Using adeno-associated virus subtype 9 (AAV9) as a delivery vector, we expressed human YAP (hYAP) in the adult murine myocardium immediately after MI. We found that AAV9: hYAP significantly improved cardiac function and mouse survival. AAV9: hYAP did not exert its salutary effects by reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Rather, AAV9: hYAP stimulated adult cardiomyocyte proliferation. Gene expression profiling indicated that AAV9: hYAP stimulated expression of cell cycle genes and promoted a less mature cardiac gene expression signature. Conclusions: Cardiac-specific YAP activation after MI mitigated myocardial injury, improved cardiac function, and enhanced survival. These findings suggest that therapeutic activation of YAP or its downstream targets, potentially through AAV-mediated gene therapy, may be a strategy to improve outcome after MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available