4.7 Article

cGMP Signals Modulate cAMP Levels in a Compartment-Specific Manner to Regulate Catecholamine-Dependent Signaling in Cardiac Myocytes

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 929-U110

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.230698

Keywords

cAMP; cGMP; ANP; nitric oxide; signal transduction

Funding

  1. Fondation Leducq [O6 CVD 02]
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/07/091/23698]
  3. National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 AA18060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: cAMP and cGMP are intracellular second messengers involved in heart pathophysiology. cGMP can potentially affect cAMP signals via cGMP-regulated phosphodiesterases (PDEs). Objective: To study the effect of cGMP signals on the local cAMP response to catecholamines in specific subcellular compartments. Methods and Results: We used real-time FRET imaging of living rat ventriculocytes expressing targeted cAMP and cGMP biosensors to detect cyclic nucleotides levels in specific locales. We found that the compartmentalized, but not the global, cAMP response to isoproterenol is profoundly affected by cGMP signals. The effect of cGMP is to increase cAMP levels in the compartment where the protein kinase (PK) A-RI isoforms reside but to decrease cAMP in the compartment where the PKA-RII isoforms reside. These opposing effects are determined by the cGMP-regulated PDEs, namely PDE2 and PDE3, with the local activity of these PDEs being critically important. The cGMP-mediated modulation of cAMP also affects the phosphorylation of PKA targets and myocyte contractility. Conclusions: cGMP signals exert opposing effects on local cAMP levels via different PDEs the activity of which is exerted in spatially distinct subcellular domains. Inhibition of PDE2 selectively abolishes the negative effects of cGMP on cAMP and may have therapeutic potential. (Circ Res. 2011;108:929-939.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available