4.7 Article

Increasing Cardiac Contractility After Myocardial Infarction Exacerbates Cardiac Injury and Pump Dysfunction

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 800-U314

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.219220

Keywords

myocardial infarction; cardiac contractility; heart failure; Ca2+ handling

Funding

  1. NIH [HL089312, HL033921, HL091799, HL088243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Myocardial infarction (MI) leads to heart failure (HF) and premature death. The respective roles of myocyte death and depressed myocyte contractility in the induction of HF after MI have not been clearly defined and are the focus of this study. Objectives: We developed a mouse model in which we could prevent depressed myocyte contractility after MI and used it to test the idea that preventing depression of myocyte ca(2+)-handling defects could avert post-MI cardiac pump dysfunction. Methods and Results: MI was produced in mice with inducible, cardiac-specific expression of the beta 2a subunit of the L-type ca(2+) channel. Myocyte and cardiac function were compared in control and beta 2a animals before and after MI. beta 2a myocytes had increased ca(2+) current; sarcoplasmic reticulum ca(2+) load, contraction and ca(2+) transients (versus controls), and beta 2a hearts had increased performance before MI. After MI, cardiac function decreased. However, ventricular dilation, myocyte hypertrophy and death, and depressed cardiac pump function were greater in beta 2a versus control hearts after MI. beta 2a animals also had poorer survival after MI. Myocytes isolated from beta 2a hearts after MI did not develop depressed ca(2+) handling, and ca(2+) current, contractions, and ca(2+) transients were still above control levels (before MI). Conclusions: Maintaining myocyte contractility after MI, by increasing ca(2+) influx, depresses rather than improves cardiac pump function after MI by reducing myocyte number. (Circ Res. 2010;107:800-809.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available