4.5 Article

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial With a Rho-Kinase Inhibitor in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension - A Pilot Efficacy Trial -

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 77, Issue 10, Pages 2619-2625

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-0443

Keywords

Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Rho-kinase inhibitor; Signal transduction

Funding

  1. Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We have previously demonstrated that long-term inhibition of Rho-kinase ameliorates pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in animal models. In the present study, we examined the clinical effects of mid-term oral treatment with an extended release formulation of AT-877 (fasudil hydrochloride), a specific Rho-kinase inhibitor (AT-877ER) on PAH. Methods and Results: 23 PAH patients were treated with either placebo (10/2 females/males, 51 +/- 16 years, idiopathic PAH (IPAH) in 6, PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH) in 3, PAH with congenital heart disease (CHD-PAH) in 2, and portal PAH in 1) or AT-877ER (6/5 females/males, 47 +/- 14 years, IPAH in 2, CTD-PAH in 5, and CHD-PAH in 4); 3 patients were excluded. We performed a 6-min walk test and right heart catheterization in the remaining 20 patients, before and 3 months after the treatment (placebo n=11, AT-877ER n=9). Although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups for the 6-min walk distance, pulmonary hemodynamics tended to be improved in the AT-877ER group, especially the prevalence of improved cardiac index from baseline, which was significantly higher in the AT-877ER than in the placebo group. In the AT-877ER group, serum levels of hydroxyfasudil, an active metabolite of AT-877ER tended to correlate with improvements in the cardiac index and mean pulmonary artery pressure. Conclusions: Mid-term treatment with oral AT-877ER showed additional improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with PAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available