4.5 Article

Effects of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Implantation in Canine Model of Pulmonary Hypertension

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 977-985

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1175

Keywords

ABM-MNCs; DMCT; Pulmonary hypertension

Funding

  1. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University, IIFSDU [2010TS051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We investigated the safety and feasibility of intratracheal administration of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (ABM-MNCs) and observed the effects in a canine model of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods and Results: The PH model was induced by intravenous injection of 3 mg/kg dehydromonocrotaline (DMCT) via the right atrium. Two weeks after DMCT administration, the animals received 4 different treatments (n=10 in each group): (I) negative control group; (II): ABM-MNCs group; (Ill) PH group; (IV) PH+ABM-MNCs group. Six weeks after injection of cells (10(7)), the hemodynamic data were significantly improved in group IV compared with group III (P<0.05). The ratio of right ventricular weight to left ventricular plus septal weight was significantly decreased in group IV compared with group III (P<0.05). The mRNA levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, preproendo-thelin-1, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were significantly improved in group IV compared with group III (P<0.05). The immunofluorescence result showed that 6 weeks after administration ABM-MNCs could differentiate into pulmonary vascular endothelial cells. Conclusions: Six weeks after intratracheal administration, ABM-MNCs significantly improved the impairment caused by DMCT in a canine model of PH (ie, decreased pulmonary arteriolar narrowing, alveolar septum thickening and right ventricular hypertrophy, enhanced angiogenesis) and this provides a firm foundation for a clinical trial. (Circ J 2012; 76: 977-985)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available