4.5 Article

The Significance of Measuring Body Fat Percentage Determined by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Detecting Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 76, Issue 10, Pages 2435-2442

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0337

Keywords

Body fat percentage; Body mass index; Cardiovascular disease risk factor; Obesity; Smoking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Body fat percentage (BF%) determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis is widely used at home and in medical check-ups. However, the clinical significance of measuring BF% has not been studied in detail. Methods and Results: A cross-sectional study was carried out on a cohort of 10,774 middle-aged Japanese men who had undergone an annual check-up in 2008. Cut-off points were evaluated for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and BF% for detecting participants with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia), and effectiveness compared for each marker's cut-off point. Additionally, the effects of smoking on cut-off points were evaluated. The cut-off points of BMI, WC, and BF% for detecting participants with 1 or more CVD risk factors were 22.7 kg/m(2), 81.4cm, and 20.3%, respectively. The cut-off points of BF% for 1 or more CVD risk factors classified 3.43% more subjects into correct categories than those of BMI (P<0.001). The cut-off points of BMI, WC, and BF% for detecting individuals with 3 CVD risk factors in current smokers were 24.9 kg/m(2), 87.8 cm, and 23.7%, while those in non-smokers were 23.3 kg/m(2), 83.9 cm, and 22.3%, respectively. Conclusions: BF% could be more effective in detecting individuals with early stage CVD risk accumulation than BMI. The cut-off points for current smokers were lower than those for non-smokers in all markers. (Circ J 2012; 76: 2435-2442)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available