4.5 Article

Treatment Performance Measures Affect Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Systolic Heart Failure - Report From the Korean Heart Failure Registry

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 1151-1158

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1093

Keywords

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction; Mortality; Performance measures

Funding

  1. Korean Society of Heart Failure
  2. Korean Society of Cardiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is a paucity of data on the effects of adherence to treatment on outcomes for patients with acute heart failure (HF) in Korea. We used HF performance measures to evaluate overall adherence and whether this affects clinical outcomes. Methods and Results: Among 3,466 patients in the Korean Heart Failure Registry, 1,527 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) who survived hospitalization were evaluated. Modified validated performance measures were defined as follows: use at discharge of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE!), angiotens-inreceptor II blocker (ARB), beta-blocker or aldosterone receptor antagonist. Adherence to performance measures were as follows: ACEI or ARB at discharge, 68.0%; beta-blocker at discharge, 40.9%; aldosterone receptor antagonist at discharge, 37.5%. On multivariate analysis, adherence to the measure of ACEI or ARB use at discharge was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio (OR), 0.344; 95% confidence interval (Cl), 0.123-0.964), readmission (OR, 0.180; 95%CI, 0.062-0.522) and mortality/readmission (OR, 0.297; 95%CI, 0.125-0.707) at 60 days and that for beta-blocker with mortality (OR, 0.337; 95%CI, 0.147-0.774) at 1 year. Conclusions: For patients with LVSD in Korea, adherence to treatment performance measures, including prescription of an ACEI/ARB and beta-blocker use at discharge, is associated with improved clinical outcomes. (Circ J 2012; 76: 1151-1158)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available