4.5 Article

Pregnancy-Associated Aortic Dilatation or Dissection in Japanese Women With Marfan Syndrome

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 75, Issue 11, Pages 2545-2551

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0465

Keywords

Aortic dissection; Aortic size index; Marfan syndrome; Pregnancy; Sinus of Valsalva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Aortic dilatation and dissection are severe complications of pregnancy that may cause maternal death. The purpose of the present study was to investigate risk factors for aortic dilatation or dissection in pregnant Japanese women with Marfan syndrome. Methods and Results: A total of 28 patients with Marfan syndrome were investigated retrospectively during pregnancy and after delivery at 1 institution. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those who experienced aortic dilatation or dissection (group D, n=11) and those who did not (group ND, n=17). In group D, aortic dilatation or dissection occurred in 7 cases during pregnancy (2 in the 2(nd) trimester, 5 in the 3(rd) trimester) and 4 cases after birth. The 2 cases in the 2(nd) trimester involved aortic dilatation >60 mm and those patients underwent hemiarch replacement and a David operation, respectively. Delivery by cesarean section (64% vs. 18%, P<0.05), sinus of Valsalva >= 40 mm (86% vs. 21%, P<0.05), aortic size index (size of sinus of Valsalva/body surface area) >= 25 mm/m(2) (7/7, 100% vs. 0/14, 0%, P<0.0001), and faster growth of the sinus of the Valsalva (median, [interquartile range]: 0.41 mm/month [0.23-0.66 mm/month] vs. 0.05 mm/month [-0.13 to 0.22 mm/month]; P<0.05) were significantly higher in group D than in group ND. Conclusions: A large sinus of Valsalva, increased aortic size index, and rapid growth of the sinus of Valsalva are risk factors for aortic dilatation or dissection in pregnant Japanese women with Marfan syndrome. (Circ J 2011; 75: 2545-2551)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available