4.5 Article

Comparison Between the Effect of Omeprazole and Rabeprazole on the Antiplatelet Action of Clopidogrel

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 74, Issue 10, Pages 2187-2192

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0913

Keywords

Clopidogrel; Omeprazole; Platelet aggregation; Rabeprazole

Funding

  1. Chulalongkorn University
  2. Chulalongkorn University graduate school thesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Emerging data suggests that several proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), including omeprazole, might interfere with the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel. However, there is a lack of data for rabeprazole. This study aimed to investigate and compare the impact of omeprazole and rabeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and Results: A prospective, randomized, open-labeled study was conducted among 87 CAD patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin. Forty three and 44 patients were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg once daily, respectively, for at least 2 weeks. Adenosine 5-diphosphate 20 mu mol/L-induced platelet aggregation was performed before and after PPIs treatment. Mean maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) before and after PPIs treatment of both groups were compared. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the mean MPA between the omeprazole and rabeprazole groups (40.68 +/- 18.82% vs 36.42 +/- 21.39%; P=0.326). After a 2-week treatment with PPIs, the mean MPA in both groups significantly increased from baseline and there were no differences between the omeprazole and rabeprazole groups (55.73 +/- 19.66% vs 48.46 +/- 18.80%; P=0.141). Conclusions: Both omeprazole and rabeprazole decreased the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. Use of these agents resulted in a similar degree of interference on clopidogrel's action, as measured by ADP-induced platelet aggregation. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2187-2192)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available