4.8 Article

Outcomes of Temporary Interruption of Rivaroxaban Compared With Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 129, Issue 18, Pages 1850-1859

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005754

Keywords

anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; stroke

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Ortho McNeil Janssen
  3. Bayer HealthCare
  4. Genzyme
  5. Johnson Johnson
  6. Boston Scientific
  7. Medtronic
  8. Forest Laboratories
  9. Sanofi Aventis
  10. Eliot B. and Edith C. Shoolman fund of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA)
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Daiichi Sankyo
  13. Pfizer
  14. Sanofi
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. Bayer
  17. Eli Lilly
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. Merck
  20. Momenta Pharmaceuticals
  21. Novartis
  22. Portola
  23. Pozen
  24. Regado Biotechnologies
  25. Sanofi-Aventis
  26. Medicines Company
  27. Ortho/McNeill
  28. Polymedix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background During long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, temporary interruptions (TIs) of therapy are common, but the relationship between patient outcomes and TIs has not been well studied. We sought to determine reasons for TI, the characteristics of patients undergoing TI, and the relationship between anticoagulant and outcomes among patients with TI. Methods and Results In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes, including stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, death, myocardial infarction, and bleeding, were reported in participants who experienced TI (3-30 days) for any reason. The at-risk period for outcomes associated with TI was from TI start to 30 days after resumption of study drug. In 14 236 participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 4692 (33%) experienced TI. Participants with TI were similar to the overall ROCKET AF population in regard to baseline clinical characteristics. Only 6% (n=483) of TI incidences involved bridging therapy. Stroke/systemic embolism rates during the at-risk period were similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.30% versus 0.41% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=0.74 [0.36-1.50]; P=0.40). Risk of major bleeding during the at-risk period was also similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.99% versus 0.79% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=1.26 [0.80-2.00]; P=0.32). Conclusions TI of oral anticoagulation is common and is associated with substantial stroke risks and bleeding risks that were similar among patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal management strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring TI of anticoagulation. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available