4.8 Article

Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 130, Issue 21, Pages 1868-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010905

Keywords

defibrillators; epidemiology; resuscitation; survival

Funding

  1. Cardiovascular Research Netherlands (CVON: PREDICT) [2012-10]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ZonMW Vici) [918.86.616]
  3. Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board
  4. European Community [241679]
  5. Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure The Netherlands
  6. Physio-Control Inc (Redmond, WA)
  7. Zoll Medical (Chelmsford, MA)
  8. Defibtech (Guilford, CT)
  9. Cardiac Science (Waukesha, WI)
  10. ZonMW [82711001]
  11. Dutch Heart Foundation [2010T083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-In recent years, a wider use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was advocated in The Netherlands. We aimed to establish whether survival with favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has significantly increased, and, if so, whether this is attributable to AED use. Methods and Results-We performed a population-based cohort study, including patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from cardiac causes between 2006 and 2012, excluding emergency medical service-witnessed arrests. We determined survival status at each stage (to emergency department, to admission, and to discharge) and examined temporal trends using logistic regression analysis with year of resuscitation as an independent variable. By adding each covariable subsequently to the regression model, we investigated their impact on the odds ratio of year of resuscitation. Analyses were performed according to initial rhythm (shockable versus nonshockable) and AED use. Rates of survival with favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increased significantly (N=6133, 16.2% to 19.7%; P for trend=0.021), although solely in patients presenting with a shockable initial rhythm (N=2823; 29.1% to 41.4%; P for trend<0.001). In this group, survival increased at each stage but was strongest in the prehospital phase (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.16]). Rates of AED use almost tripled during the study period (21.4% to 59.3%; P for trend<0.001), thereby decreasing time from emergency call to defibrillation-device connection (median, 9.9 to 8.0 minutes; P<0.001). AED use statistically explained increased survival with favorable neurologic outcome by decreasing the odds ratio of year of resuscitation to a nonsignificant 1.04. Conclusions-Increased AED use is associated with increased survival in patients with a shockable initial rhythm. We recommend continuous efforts to introduce or extend AED programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available