4.2 Article

Grass-skipper (Hesperiinae) trends in midwestern USA grasslands during 1988-2013

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 279-292

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-015-9759-4

Keywords

Hesperia ottoe; Grassland management; Burning; Butterfly declines; Specialist butterfly; Population persistence

Funding

  1. Lois Almon Small Grants Research Program
  2. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)
  3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We surveyed butterflies in prairies, pine-oak barrens, and degraded grasslands during 1988-2013 in southern Wisconsin, USA. In prairie preserves (primarily managed with frequent fire), both specialist and non-specialist grassland grass-skippers declined strongly. Specialists inhabiting the native herbaceous flora of pine-oak barrens that had little management but relatively consistent vegetation over time had large fluctuations but more stable trends. Grassland grass-skippers showed similar more stable trends in barrens and degraded fields with relatively consistent vegetation over time. Significant population trends did not relate clearly to how southerly the species' ranges are. Specialist and grassland grass-skipper persistence after prairie preservation correlated negatively with both number of years since preservation and prairie patch size. We also analyzed grass-skipper abundance during 1977-2012 in midwestern 4th of July Butterfly Counts, an annual volunteer butterfly census. Specialists declined significantly but grassland as well as forest and wetland grass-skippers averaged a non-trend. We hypothesize that the reasons why fire management is adverse are because of direct mortality and also the thick tall grass regrowth, which may be unsuitable for larvae to use. It appears urgent to identify and implement management strategies in prairie preserves that consistently maintain grassland vegetation as required by grass-skippers in ways the grass-skippers themselves tolerate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available