4.8 Article

Vorapaxar in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Results From TRA2°P-TIMI 50

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 127, Issue 14, Pages 1522-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000679

Keywords

ischemia; outcome assessment; peripheral arterial disease; platelet aggregation inhibitors; vorapaxar

Funding

  1. Merck and Co.
  2. Accumetrics
  3. Amgen
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Beckman Coulter
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. CV Therapeutics
  8. Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd
  9. Eli Lilly and Co
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Integrated Therapeutics
  12. Nanosphere
  13. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  14. Nuvelo
  15. OrthoClinical Diagnostics
  16. Pfizer
  17. Roche Diagnostics
  18. Sanofi-Aventis
  19. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  20. Siemens Medical Solutions
  21. Singulex
  22. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K12 HL083786]
  23. Lexicon
  24. Arena
  25. Gilead
  26. Eisai
  27. Aastrom Biosciences
  28. Baxter Healthcare
  29. Genzyme
  30. Merck
  31. Plurestem
  32. Swiss National Foundation
  33. Bayer-Schering Pharma
  34. Schering-Plow
  35. Daiichi-Sankyo
  36. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  37. Actelion
  38. Eli Lilly
  39. Amarin Pharmaceuticals
  40. Beckman-Coulter
  41. Critical Diagnostics
  42. Genentech
  43. Instrumentation Laboratory
  44. Novartis
  45. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Vorapaxar is a novel antagonist of protease-activated receptor-1, the primary receptor for thrombin on human platelets that is also present on vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. Patients with peripheral artery disease are at risk of systemic atherothrombotic events, as well as acute and chronic limb ischemia and the need for peripheral revascularization. Methods and Results-The Trial to Assess the Effects of SCH 530348 in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA2 degrees P-TIMI 50) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar in 26 449 patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery disease). Patients with qualifying peripheral artery disease (n=3787) had a history of claudication and an ankle-brachial index of <0.85 or prior revascularization for limb ischemia. The primary efficacy end point was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the principal safety end point was Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) bleeding. In the peripheral artery disease cohort, the primary end point did not differ significantly with vorapaxar (11.3% versus 11.9%; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.14; P=0.53). However, rates of hospitalization for acute limb ischemia (2.3% versus 3.9%; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.86; P=0.006) and peripheral artery revascularization (18.4% versus 22.2%; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.97; P=0.017) were significantly lower in patients randomized to vorapaxar. Bleeding occurred more frequently with vorapaxar compared with placebo (7.4% versus 4.5%; hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.18; P=0.001). Conclusions-Vorapaxar did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with peripheral artery disease; however, vorapaxar significantly reduced acute limb ischemia and peripheral revascularization. The beneficial effects of protease-activated receptor-1 antagonism on limb vascular events were accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available