4.8 Article

Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel by Geographic Region in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages 544-U78

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.047498

Keywords

aspirin; acute coronary syndrome; myocardial infarction; outcomes

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bayer
  3. Boehringer Ingleheim
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Johnson Johnson
  8. Merck
  9. Ortho/McNeill
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Schering-Plough (now Merck)
  12. Daiichi Sankyo
  13. Novartis
  14. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  15. Pozen
  16. Regado
  17. Regado Biosciences
  18. Eisai
  19. Teva
  20. Accumetrics
  21. Dynabyte
  22. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi-Aventis
  23. Otsuka
  24. Boston Scientific
  25. Eli Lilly Co
  26. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc
  27. Portola
  28. Intekrin Therapeutics
  29. Takeda
  30. Medicines Company
  31. CSL Behring
  32. Merck/Schering-Plough

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, a prespecified subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and region (P = 0.045), with less effect of ticagrelor in North America than in the rest of the world. Methods and Results-Reasons for the interaction were explored independently by 2 statistical groups. Systematic errors in trial conduct were investigated. Statistical approaches evaluated the likelihood of play of chance. Cox regression analyses were performed to quantify how much of the regional interaction could be explained by patient characteristics and concomitant treatments, including aspirin maintenance therapy. Landmark Cox regressions at 8 time points evaluated the association of selected factors, including aspirin dose, with outcomes by treatment. Systematic errors in trial conduct were ruled out. Given the large number of subgroup analyses performed and that a result numerically favoring clopidogrel in at least 1 of the 4 prespecified regions could occur with 32% probability, chance alone cannot be ruled out. More patients in the United States (53.6%) than in the rest of the world (1.7%) took a median aspirin dose >= 300 mg/d. Of 37 baseline and postrandomization factors explored, only aspirin dose explained a substantial fraction of the regional interaction. In adjusted analyses, both Cox regression with median maintenance dose and landmark techniques showed that, in patients taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, ticagrelor was associated with better outcomes compared with clopidogrel, with statistical superiority in the rest of the world and similar outcomes in the US cohort. Conclusions-The regional interaction could arise from chance alone. Results of 2 independently performed analyses identified an underlying statistical interaction with aspirin maintenance dose as a possible explanation for the regional difference. The lowest risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel is associated with a low maintenance dose of concomitant aspirin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available