4.8 Article

Randomized Trial of Atopaxar in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The Lessons From Antagonizing the Cellular Effect of Thrombin-Coronary Artery Disease Trial

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 123, Issue 17, Pages 1854-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.001404

Keywords

anticoagulants; blood platelets; clinical trials; coronary artery disease; platelet aggregation inhibitors; stroke

Funding

  1. Eisai Pharmaceuticals
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Daiichi Sankyo
  4. Schering Plough
  5. Bristol Myers Squibb
  6. Sanofi-aventis
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. ARENA
  9. Medco
  10. Novartis
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Eisai
  13. Otsuka
  14. Merck
  15. Eli Lilly and Co
  16. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc
  17. Medicines Company
  18. Portola
  19. Medicure
  20. Accumetrics
  21. Arena Pharmaceuticals
  22. Evolva
  23. Boston Scientific
  24. Johnson Johnson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Thrombin is a key mediator of platelet activation. Atopaxar is a reversible protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist that interferes with thrombin-mediated platelet effects. The phase II Lessons From Antagonizing the Cellular Effect of Thrombin-Coronary Artery Disease (LANCELOT-CAD) trial examined the safety and tolerability of prolonged therapy with atopaxar in subjects with CAD. Methods and Results-Subjects with a qualifying history were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 3 dosing regimens of atopaxar (50, 100, or 200 mg daily) or matching placebo for 24 weeks and followed up for an additional 4 weeks. The key safety end points were bleeding according to the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classifications. Secondary objectives included platelet aggregation and major adverse cardiac events. Seven hundred and twenty subjects were randomized. Overall bleeding rates tended to be higher with atopaxar compared with placebo by CURE criteria (placebo, 0.6%; atopaxar, 3.9%; relative risk, 6.82, P = 0.03; 50 mg, 3.9%; 100 mg, 1.7%; 200 mg, 5.9%; P for trend = 0.01) and TIMI criteria (placebo, 6.8%; atopaxar, 10.3%; relative risk, 1.52, P = 0.17; 50 mg, 9.9%; 100 mg, 8.1%; 200 mg, 12.9%; P for trend = 0.07). There was no difference in major bleeding. Major adverse cardiac events were numerically lower in the atopaxar subjects. All atopaxar regimens achieved high levels of platelet inhibition. A transient elevation in liver transaminases and dose-dependent QTc prolongation without apparent complications were observed in higher-dose atopaxar treatment groups. Conclusions-In this dose-ranging study of patients with CAD, treatment with atopaxar resulted in platelet inhibition, more minor bleeding, and numerically but not statistically fewer ischemic events. Larger-scale trials are needed to determine whether these patterns translate into clinically meaningful effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available