Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Off pump coronary artery bypass: a passing fad or ready for prime time?
Norman Briffa
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2008)
Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Christian H. Moller et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2008)
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes:: meta-epidemiological study
Lesley Wood et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Excellent results of contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting with systematic application of modern perioperative strategies
Farzan Filsoufi et al.
HEART SURGERY FORUM (2007)
The Best Bypass Surgery Trial:: Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment of conventional versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Christian H. Moller et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Cognitive outcomes in elderly high-risk patients after off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting - A randomized trial
Birte Ostergaard Jensen et al.
CIRCULATION (2006)
Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial
Sharif Al-Ruzzeh et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2006)
Using the EuroSCORE to assess changes in the risk profiles of the patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting before and after the introduction of less invasive coronary surgery
T Ohata et al.
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2005)
Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass versus the conventional approach in high-risk patients
SC Stamou et al.
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2005)
Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes a randomized trial
JD Puskas et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: Final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4
Z Straka et al.
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2004)
High risk coronary artery bypass patient: Incidence, surgical strategies, and results
M Gaudino et al.
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2004)
Clinical prediction rule for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting
D Amar et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2004)
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease
MJ Mack et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2004)
Adverse events in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) trials: a systematic review and analysis
L Nalysnyk et al.
HEART (2003)
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting
JD Puskas et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2003)
Early and late outcome of myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in high risk patients (EuroSCORE ≥ 6)
AM Calafiore et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2003)
A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients
HM Nathoe et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2003)
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients
S Al-Ruzzeh et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2003)
Post-randomisation exclusions:: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
D Fergusson et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2002)
Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials
GD Angelini et al.
LANCET (2002)
Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses
LL Kjaergard et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2001)
Share Paper
