4.8 Article

Television Viewing Time and Mortality The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 384-391

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894824

Keywords

epidemiology; exercise; lifestyle; mortality; obesity; risk factors

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [233200, 379305, 569861, 301200]
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
  3. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  4. Abbott Australasia
  5. Alphapharm
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Aventis Pharma
  8. Bio-Rad Laboratories
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. City Health Centre Diabetes Service Canberra
  11. Department of Health and Community Services Northern Territory
  12. Department of Health and Human Services Tasmania
  13. Department of Health New South Wales
  14. Department of Health Western Australia
  15. Department of Human Services South Australia
  16. Department of Human Services Victoria
  17. Diabetes Australia
  18. Diabetes Australia Northern Territory
  19. Eli Lilly Australia
  20. Estate of the Late Edward Wilson
  21. GlaxoSmithKline
  22. Highpoint Shopping Centre
  23. Jack Brockhoff Foundation
  24. Janssen-Cilag
  25. Kidney Health Australia
  26. Marian EH Flack Trust
  27. Menzies Research Institute
  28. Merck Sharp Dohme
  29. Multiplex, Novartis Pharmaceuticals,
  30. Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals
  31. Pfizer Pty Ltd
  32. Pratt Foundation
  33. Queensland Health
  34. Roche Diagnostics Australia
  35. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney
  36. SanofiSynthelabo
  37. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation Public Health Research Fellowship
  38. National Heart Foundation of Australia [PP 05M 2346, PH 08B 3905]
  39. National Heart Foundation of Australia postgraduate scholarship [PP 04M 1794]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Television viewing time, the predominant leisure-time sedentary behavior, is associated with biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk, but its relationship with mortality has not been studied. We examined the associations of prolonged television viewing time with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and non-CVD/noncancer mortality in Australian adults. Methods and Results-Television viewing time in relation to subsequent all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality (median follow-up, 6.6 years) was examined among 8800 adults > 25 years of age in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). During 58 087 person-years of follow-up, there were 284 deaths (87 CVD deaths, 125 cancer deaths). After adjustment for age, sex, waist circumference, and exercise, the hazard ratios for each 1-hour increment in television viewing time per day were 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.20) for all-cause mortality, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.35) for CVD mortality, and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.23) for cancer mortality. Compared with a television viewing time of < 2 h/d, the fully adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.36) for >= 2 to < 4 h/d and 1.46 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.05) for >= 4 h/d. For CVD mortality, corresponding hazard ratios were 1.19 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.99) and 1.80 (95% CI, 1.00 to 3.25). The associations with both cancer mortality and non-CVD/noncancer mortality were not significant. Conclusions-Television viewing time was associated with increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. In addition to the promotion of exercise, chronic disease prevention strategies could focus on reducing sitting time, particularly prolonged television viewing. (Circulation. 2010;121:384-391.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available