4.8 Article

Adenylyl cyclase type 6 deletion decreases left ventricular function via impaired calcium handling

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 61-69

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.730069

Keywords

calcium; knockout mice; heart contractility; receptors, adrenergic, beta

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL081741, R01 HL081741, P01 HL66941] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL066941, R01HL081741] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Adenylyl cyclases (ACs) are a family of effector molecules for G-protein - coupled receptors. The 2 ACs most abundantly expressed in cardiac myocytes are types 5 (AC5) and 6 (AC6), which have 65% amino acid homology. It has been speculated that coexpression of 2 AC types in cardiac myocytes represents redundancy, but the specific role of AC6 in cardiac physiology and its differences from AC5 remain to be defined. Methods and Results-We generated transgenic mice with targeted deletion of AC6. Deletion of AC6 was associated with reduced left ventricular contractile function (P = 0.026) and relaxation (P = 0.041). The absence of AC6 was associated with a 48% decay in beta-adrenergic receptor-stimulated cAMP production in cardiac myocytes (P = 0.003) and reduced protein kinase A activity (P = 0.015). In addition, phospholamban phosphorylation was reduced (P = 0.015), sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase activity was impaired (P < 0.0001), and cardiac myocytes showed marked abnormalities in calcium transient formation (P = 0.001). Conclusions-The combination of impaired cardiac cAMP generation and calcium handling that result from AC6 deletion underlies abnormalities in left ventricular function. The biochemical and physiological consequences of AC6 deletion reveal it to be an important effector molecule in the adult heart, serving unique biological functions not replicated by AC5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available