4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic and Dose-Response Relationships of Antituberculosis Drugs: Recommendations and Standards for Industry and Academia

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages S96-S106

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu610

Keywords

antituberculosis agents; drug development; pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics; dose identification; susceptibility breakpoint; hollow fiber system; mouse model; guinea pig model; Monte Carlo simulations; clinical correlations

Funding

  1. CPTR
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) science is vital to early antibiotic drug development to enable more efficient dose-effect study designs, identification of doses that may suppress drug resistance and choice of susceptibility breakpoints. Proper conduct of such studies is essential in the field of tuberculosis. Methods. We conducted an exhaustive review of literature on the hollow fiber system (HFS) model, murine model, and guinea pig model of tuberculosis as well as clinical studies to identify PK/PD studies that have been applied to antituberculosis therapy. Lessons learned are presented as recommendations and standards for both industry and academia in the field of antituberculosis drug development. Results. PK/PD studies have been performed for both first-line and experimental antituberculosis agents. When properly designed exposure-effect and dose-fractionation studies have been performed in preclinical models, optimal drug exposures, and PK/PD parameters identified in these models have been found to be similar to clinical studies. Susceptibility breakpoints identified using these methods differed from previous concentrations in the literature but were found to be similar to those in prospective clinical studies. Conclusions. Preclinical PK/PD studies are essential value added in the development of antituberculosis agents. We provide 8 recommendations and standards for the proper conduct of such studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available