4.3 Article

Outdoor Light at Night (LAN) Is Correlated With Eveningness in Adolescents

Journal

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 502-508

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2011.635232

Keywords

Adolescents; Chronotype; CSM; Electronic screen media; Intake of stimulants; Light at night (LAN); Light pollution; Midpoint of sleep; Remote sensing

Funding

  1. University of Education, Heidelberg [70131211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

External zeitgebers synchronize the human circadian rhythm of sleep and wakefulness. Humans adapt their chronotype to the day-night cycle, the strongest external zeitgeber. The human circadian rhythm shifts to evening-type orientation when daylight is prolonged into the evening and night hours by artificial light sources. Data from a survey of 1507 German adolescents covering questions about chronotype and electronic screen media use combined with nocturnal satellite image data suggest a relationship between chronotype and artificial nocturnal light. Adolescents living in brightly illuminated urban districts had a stronger evening-type orientation than adolescents living in darker and more rural municipalities. This result persisted when controlling for time use of electronic screen media, intake of stimulants, type of school, age, puberty status, time of sunrise, sex, and population density. Time spent on electronic screen media use-a source of indoor light at night-is also correlated with eveningness, as well as intake of stimulants, age, and puberty status, and, to a lesser degree, type of school and time of sunrise. Adequate urban development design and parents limiting adolescents' electronic screen media use in the evening could help to adjust adolescents' zeitgeber to early school schedules when they provide appropriate lighting conditions for daytime and for nighttime. (Author correspondence: vollmer@ph-heidelberg.de)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available