4.3 Article

The Nocturnal Activity of Fruit Flies Exposed to Artificial Moonlight Is Partly Caused by Direct Light Effects on the Activity Level That Bypass the Endogenous Clock

Journal

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 151-166

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07420520902747124

Keywords

Drosophila; Masking; Period; Timeless; Dim light

Funding

  1. DFG
  2. EUCLOCK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial moonlight was recently shown to shift the endogenous clock of fruit flies and make them nocturnal. To test whether this nocturnal activity is partly due to masking effects of light, we exposed the clock-mutants per01, tim01, per01;tim01, cyc01, and ClkJRK to light/dark and light/dim-light cycles and determined the activity level during the day and night. We found that under moonlit nights, all clock mutants shifted their activity significantly into the night, suggesting that this effect is independent of the clock. We also recorded the flies under continuous artificial moonlight and darkness to judge the effect of dim constant light on the activity level. All mutants, except ClkJRK flies, were significantly more active under artificial moonlight conditions than under complete darkness. Unexpectedly, we found residual rhythmicity of per01 and especially tim01 mutants under these conditions, suggesting that TIM and especially PER retained some activity in the absence of its respective partner. Nevertheless, as even the double mutants and the cyc01 and ClkJRK mutants shifted their activity into the night, we conclude that dim light stimulates the activity of fruit flies in a clock-independent manner. Thus, nocturnal light has a twofold influence on flies: it shifts the circadian clock, and it increases nocturnal activity independently of the clock. The latter was also observed in some primates by others and might therefore be of a more general validity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available