4.2 Article

High-Throughput Screening of Drugs of Abuse in Urine by Supported Liquid-Liquid Extraction and UHPLC Coupled to Tandem MS

Journal

CHROMATOGRAPHIA
Volume 70, Issue 9-10, Pages 1373-1380

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-009-1337-z

Keywords

Supported liquid-liquid extraction; Ultra high pressure liquid chromatography; Tandem mass spectrometry; Drugs of abuse in urine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A qualitative method, involving supported liquid-liquid extraction (SLE) and ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS-MS), was developed for the rapid tentative identification of various drugs of abuse in urine. In this study, 28 drugs and metabolites were covered by the screening procedure. Before analysis, urine samples were extracted by SLE and good extraction recoveries were obtained for most investigated compounds. The UHPLC strategy was then selected for the rapid separation of amphetamines, cocaine, opiates and related compounds in urine. Using columns packed with sub-2 A mu m particles, analysis time was reduced down to 2 min, while maintaining acceptable performance. Finally, the detection was by tandem MS operating in the single reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The most intense transition was selected for the different drugs and SRM dwell times set at 5 ms, to maintain sufficient data points across the narrow UHPLC peaks. The tentative identification of the drugs of interest, including amphetamines, opiates and cocaine, was based on both, retention times and mass spectrometry information. With the proposed method, limits of detection were estimated at about 1 ng mL(-1) and the applicability was assessed by successfully analyzing several samples of drug abusers. Finally, this study demonstrates the potential of UHPLC coupled to tandem MS for the rapid screening of drugs of abuse in urine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available