4.3 Article

Enantioselective Toxic Effects of Hexaconazole Enantiomers Against Scenedesmus Obliquus

Journal

CHIRALITY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 610-614

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/chir.22018

Keywords

enantioselective; toxicity; hexaconazole; algae

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [20877100, 15050102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enantioselectivity in ecotoxicity of chiral pesticides in the aquatic environment has been a subject of growing interest. In this study, the toxicological impacts of hexaconazole enantiomers were investigated with freshwater algae Scenedesmus obliquus. After 96?h of exposure, the EC50 values for rac-hexaconazole, (+)-hexaconazole, and (-)-hexaconazole were 0.178, 0.355, and 0.065?mg?l-1, respectively. Therefore, the acute toxicities of hexaconazole enantiomers were enantioselective. In addition, the different toxic effects were evaluated when S.?obliquus were exposed to 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0?mg?l-1 of rac-hexaconazole, (+)-hexaconazole, and (-)-hexaconazole during 96?h, respectively. The chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents of S.?obliquus treated by (-)-hexaconazole were lower than those exposed to (+)-hexaconazole, whereas the malondialdehyde contents of S.?obliquus treated by (-)-form were higher than those exposed to (+)-form at higher concentrations. In general, catalase activities were significantly upregulated by exposure to (-)-enantiomer than (+)-enantiomer at all three concentrations. However, superoxide dismutase activities exposed to (-)-hexaconazole were lower than that exposed to (+)-hexaconazole at 0.2?mg?l-1 and 0.5?mg?l-1. On the basis of these data, the acute toxicity and toxic effects of hexaconazole against S.?obliquus were enantioselective, and such enantiomeric differences must be taken into consideration in pesticide risk assessment. Chirality 24:610614, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available