4.7 Review

The management of non-tuberculous cervicofacial lymphadenitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 9-18

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.02.010

Keywords

Non-tuberculous; Atypical; Mycobacteria; Lymphadenitis; Children; Treatment; Management

Funding

  1. University of Basel [DMS2219]
  2. Rozalia Foundation
  3. UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Lectureship
  4. NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit Southampton
  5. UK Technology Strategy Board [29617-219153]
  6. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-26-004] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Cervicofacial lymphadenitis is the most common manifestation of infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in immunocompetent children. Although complete excision is considered standard management, the optimal treatment remains controversial. This study reviews the evidence for different management options for NTM lymphadenitis. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed including 1951 children from sixty publications. Generalised linear mixed model regressions were used to compare treatment modalities. Results: The adjusted mean cure rate was 98% (95% CI 97.0-99.5%) for complete excision, 73.1% (95% CI 49.6-88.3%) for anti-mycobacterial antibiotics, and 70.4% (95% CI 49.6-88.3%) for 'no intervention'. Compared to 'no intervention', only complete excision was significantly associated with cure (OR 33.1; 95% CI 10.8-102.9; p < 0.001). Complete excision was associated with a 10% risk of facial nerve palsy (2% permanent). 'No intervention' was associated with delayed resolution. Conclusions: Complete excision is associated with the highest cure rate in NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis, but also had the highest risk of facial nerve palsy. In the absence of large, well-designed RCTs, the choice between surgical excision, anti-mycobacterial antibiotics and 'no intervention' should be based on the location and extent of the disease, and acceptability of prolonged time to resolution. (C) 2015 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available