4.2 Article

Ancient DNA sequences of rice from the low Yangtze reveal significant genotypic divergence

Journal

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 56, Issue 28-29, Pages 3108-3113

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4691-9

Keywords

Oryza sativa; ancient DNA sequence; Hemudu Neolithic culture; rice domestication

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB109306]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA10A102]
  3. DAAD
  4. [2007DKA20Z90]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice (Oryza sativa) was first domesticated in the lower and middle Yangtze regions of China, and rice remains have been found in many Chinese archaeological sites. Until now, only phenotypic archeobotanical evidence, such as the spikelet bases of ancient grains, has been used to speculate on the domestication process and domestication rate of rice. In this study, we sequenced 4 genomic segments from rice remains in Tianluoshan, a site of the local Hemudu Neolithic culture in the low Yangtze and two other archaeological sites (similar to 2400 and 1200 BC, respectively). We compared our sequences with those of the current domesticated and wild rice (O. rufipogon) populations. At least two genotypes were found in the remains from each site, suggesting a heterozygotic state of the rice seeds. One ancient genotype was not found in the current domesticated population and might have been lost. The rice remains belonged to the japonica group, and most if not all were japonica-type, suggesting that the remains might be at an early stage of indica-japonica divergence or an indica-japonica mixture. We also identified sequences with significant similarity to those from species of Sapindales, Zygophyllales, and Brassicales, which is consistent with the identification of other plant remains in the Tianluoshan site and the common rice field weeds such as mustards in southern China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available