4.2 Article

Concentrations, profiles and gas-particle partitioning of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PBDEs in the ambient air of an E-waste dismantling area, southeast China

Journal

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 521-528

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-008-0125-8

Keywords

PCDD/Fs; PCBs; PBDEs; air; gas-particle partitioning; E-waste

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychlorinated diebenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated diebenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were monitored in the ambient air of Taizhou, an E-waste dismantling area of southeast China to evaluate their concentrations, profiles and gas-particle partitioning. The Delta PCDD/Fs concentrations ranged from 2.91 to 50.6 pg/m(3), with an average of 14.3 pg/m(3). The I-TEQs for PCDD/Fs were in the range of 0.20-3.45 pg/m(3), with an average of 1.10 pg/m(3). The Sigma PCBs concentrations and TEQs ranged from 4.23 to 11.35 ng/m(3), 0.050 to 0.859 pg(TEQ)/m(3), respectively. The concentrations of Sigma PBDEs ranged from 92 to 3086 pg/m(3), with an average of 894 pg/m(3). The pollution levels of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PBDEs were higher than other urban sites, which may be associated with the E-waste dismantling activities. The PCDD/Fs were found exclusively in the particle phase whereas PCBs distributed dominantly in the gas phase. The gas-partilce partitioning was also assessed by correlating the gas-particle partition coefficient (K-p) with the subcooled liquid vapor pressure (P-L(0)). The measured particulate sorptions of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PBDEs were compared with the predictions from Junge-Pankow model and K-oa absorption model. The Junge-Pankow model well estimated the particulate fractions of PCBs. However, it underestimated the sorptions of PCDD/Fs and overestimated the fractions of PBDEs. The predicted particulate fractions of PCDD/Fs and PCBs from K-oa model fitted well with the measured data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available