4.6 Article

A cGAS-Independent STING/IRF7 Pathway Mediates the Immunogenicity of DNA Vaccines

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 310-316

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501836

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5 U19 AI082676, 5 P01 AI082274, 5R33AI087191]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1033112]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI082274, U19AI082676, R33AI087191] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been known since the discovery of DNA vaccines >20 y ago that DNA vaccines can function as adjuvants. Our recent study reported the involvement of Aim2 as the sensor of DNA vaccines in eliciting Ag-specific Ab responses. Our findings indicated the presence of previously unrecognized innate immune response pathways in addition to the TLR9 pathway, which is mainly activated by the CpG motifs of DNA vaccines. Our data further demonstrated the requirement of type I IFN in DNA vaccine induced immune responses via the Aim2 pathway, but the exact downstream molecular mechanism was not characterized. In the present study, we investigated the roles of the putative DNA sensor cyclic GMP AMP synthase (cGas), as well as the downstream IFN regulatory factors (IRF) 3 and 7 in type I IFN induction and Ag-specific immune responses elicited by DNA vaccination. Our results showed that DNA vaccine induced, Irf7-dependent signaling, as part of the Sting pathway, was critical for generation of both innate cytokine signaling and Ag-specific B and T cell responses. In contrast, Irf3 was not as critical as expected in this pathway and, more surprisingly, immune responses elicited by DNA vaccines were not cGas-dependent in vivo. Data from this study provide more details on the innate immune mechanisms involved in DNA vaccination and further enrich our understanding on the potential utility of DNA vaccines in generating Ag-specific immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available