4.6 Article

Deficiency of Antigen-Specific B Cells Results in Decreased Trypanosoma cruzi Systemic but Not Mucosal Immunity Due to CD8 T Cell Exhaustion

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 194, Issue 4, Pages 1806-1818

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303163

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI040196, R56A104019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vaccines against mucosally invasive, intracellular pathogens must induce a myriad of immune responses to provide optimal mucosal and systemic protection, including CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and Ab-producing B cells. In general, CD4(+) T cells are known to provide important helper functions for both CD8(+) T cell and B cell responses. However, the relative importance of CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and B cells for mucosal protection is less clearly defined. We have studied these questions in detail using the murine model of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Despite our initial hypothesis that mucosal Abs would be important, we show that B cells are critical for systemic, but not mucosal, Trypanosoma cruzi protective immunity. B cell-deficient mice developed normal levels of CD8(+) effector T cell responses early after mucosal Trypanosoma cruzi infection and Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase vaccination. However, after highly virulent systemic challenge, Trypanosoma cruzi immune mice lacking Trypanosoma cruzi-specific B cells failed to control parasitemia or prevent death. Mechanistically, Trypanosoma cruzi-specific CD8(+) T cells generated in the absence of B cells expressed increased PD-1 and Lag-3 and became functionally exhausted after high-level Trypanosoma cruzi systemic challenge. Trypanosoma cruzi immune serum prevented CD8(+) T cell functional exhaustion and reduced mortality in mice lacking B cells. Overall, these results demonstrate that Trypanosoma cruzi-specific B cells are necessary during systemic, but not mucosal, parasite challenge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available