4.6 Article

Adaptive Immunity against Streptococcus pyogenes in Adults Involves Increased IFN-γ and IgG3 Responses Compared with Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue 4, Pages 1657-1664

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500804

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen
  2. Familien Hede Nielsens Fond
  3. A.P. Moller Fonden
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. Brodrene Hartmanns Fond
  6. Beckett-Fonden
  7. Center for Nanovaccines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Each year, millions of people are infected with Streptococcus pyogenes, leading to an estimated 500,000 annual deaths worldwide. For unknown reasons, school-aged children have substantially higher infection rates than adults. The goal for this study was to provide, to our knowledge, the first detailed characterization of the human adaptive immune response against S. pyogenes in both children and adults. We report that all adults in our study, as well as most children, showed immunity against the two conserved group A streptococci (GAS) Ags, streptococcal C5a peptidase and immunogenic secreted protein. The response primarily consisted of three subsets of Th1 T cells, in which the TNF-alpha(+) and IL-2(+)TNF-alpha(+) subsets were most frequent. Humoral immunity was dominated by IgG1 and IgG3, whereas the Th2-associated IgG4 isotype was only detected at very low amounts. IgG3 levels correlated significantly with IFN-gamma, but not with IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, or TNF-alpha. Interestingly, children showed a similar pattern of Ag-specific cytokine release, but displayed significantly lower levels of IgG3 and IFN-g compared with adults. Thus, human immune responses against S. pyogenes consist of a robust Th1 cellular memory response in combination with IgG1/IgG3-dominated humoral immunity that increase with age. The significance of these data regarding both the increased GAS infection rate in children and the development of protective GAS vaccines is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available