4.6 Article

Cutting Edge: Differential Regulation of PTEN by TCR, Akt, and FoxO1 Controls CD4+ T Cell Fate Decisions

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 194, Issue 10, Pages 4615-4619

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402554

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P41 GM103712, GM080398, AI095730]
  2. National Science Foundation [0926181]
  3. National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Training Grant [T32 AI089443]
  4. National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Training Grant [T32 EB009403]
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0926181] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signaling via the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway influences CD4(+) T cell differentiation; low levels favor regulatory T cell induction and high levels favor Th induction. Although the lipid phosphatase phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) suppresses Akt activity, the control of PTEN activity is poorly studied in T cells. In this study, we identify multiple mechanisms that regulate PTEN expression. During Th induction, PTEN function is suppressed via lower mRNA levels, lower protein levels, and an increase in C-terminal phosphorylation. Conversely, during regulatory T cell induction, PTEN function is maintained through the stabilization of PTEN mRNA transcription and sustained protein levels. We demonstrate that differential Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling regulates PTEN transcription via the FoxO1 transcription factor. A mathematical model that includes multiple modes of PTEN regulation recapitulates our experimental findings and demonstrates how several feedback loops determine differentiation outcomes. Collectively, this work provides novel mechanistic insights into how differential regulation of PTEN controls alternate CD4(+) T cell fate outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available