4.6 Article

Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 2, Pages 624-636

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501202

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Rebecca L. Cooper Foundation
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1037321, 1043414, 1080321]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme Grant [361646]
  4. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support grant
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1080321] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-gamma and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available