4.6 Article

Precision Design for Machine Tool Based on Error Prediction

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 151-157

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2013.01.151

Keywords

complex forming motion; machine tool; precision design; position-pose error; error sensibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51075419]
  2. Chongqing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China [CSTC, 2009BB3234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digitization precision analysis is an important tool to ensure the design precision of machine tool currently. The correlative research about precision modeling and analysis mainly focuses on the geometry precision and motion precision of machine tool, and the forming motion precision of workpiece surface. For the machine tool with complex forming motion, there is not accurate corresponding relationship between the existing criterion on precision design and the machining precision of workpiece. Therefore, a design scheme on machine tool precision based on error prediction is proposed, which is divided into two-stage digitization precision analysis crucially. The first stage aims at the technology system to complete the precision distribution and inspection from the workpiece to various component parts of technology system and achieve the total output precision of machine tool under the specified machining precision; the second stage aims at the machine tool system to complete the precision distribution and inspection from the output precision of machine tool to the machine tool components. This article serves YK3610 gear hobber as the example to describe the error model of two systems and basic application method, and the practical cutting precision of this machine tool achieves to 5-4-4 grade. The proposed method can provide reliable guidance to the precision design of machine tool with complex forming motion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available