4.5 Article

Preparation of Helical Mesoporous Ethenylene-silica Nanofibers with Lamellar Mesopores on Their Surface

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 933-941

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.201190191

Keywords

mesoporous; helicity; ethenylene-silica; surfactants; sol-gel processes

Funding

  1. Soochow University
  2. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0698]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20871087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The morphologies and pore architectures of mesoporous ethenylene-silica were controlled using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as template and (S)-beta-citronellol as a co-structure-directing agent under basic conditions. When the (S)-beta-citronellol/CTAB molar ratios are in the range of 0.75-2.0, helical nanofibers were obtained. With increasing the (S)-beta-citronellol/CTAB molar ratio, the lengths of the nanofibers increases. Lamellar mesopores were identified on the surfaces of the nanofibers prepared in the (S)-beta-citronellol/CTAB molar ratio range of 1.5-2.0. At the (S)-beta-citronellol/CTAB molar ratio of 2.5 : 1, nanoparticles with nanoflakes on the surfaces were obtained. The field emission scanning electron microscopy images taken after different reaction times indicated that the helical pitches of the nanofibers decreased with increasing the reaction time. Helical 1,4-phenylene-silica and methylene-silica nanofibers were also prepared. The results indicated that the morphologies and pore architectures of the obtained organic-inorganic hybrid silicas are also sensitive to the hybrid silica precursors. Helical ethenylene-silica nanofibers with lamellar mesopores on their surfaces can be also prepared using the mixtures of CTAB and racemic citronellol within a narrower citronellol/CTAB molar ratio range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available