4.5 Article

Electrochemical Sensor Prepared from Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Recognition of 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (DNB)

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 2043-2048

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.200990343

Keywords

MIP/MWCNT; electrochemical sensor; selectivity; DNB determination

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20675032]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0293]
  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An electrochemical sensor was modified with multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) material synthesized with acrylamide and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) in the presence of 1,3-dinitrobenzene (DNB) as the template molecule. The MWCNT and MIP layers were successively modified on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE), of which the MIP film works as an artificial receptor due to its specific molecular recognition sites. The MIP material was characterized by FT-IR and electrochemical methods of square wave voltammetry (SWV). The interferences of other nitroaromatic compounds (NAC) such as 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNB) and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) to DNB were also investigated by the prepared MIP/MWCNT electrode. Compared with other traditional sensors, the MIP/MWCNT modified electrode shows good selectivity and sensitivity. In addition, the current responses to DNB are linear with the concentration ranging from 4.5 x 10(-8) to 8.5 x 10(-6) mol/L with the detection limits of 2.5 x 10(-8) (-0.58 V) and 1.5 x 10(-8) mol/L (-0.69 V) (S/N= 3). The construction process of MIP/MWCNT modified electrode was also studied as well. All results indicate that the MIP/MWCNT modified electrode established an improving way for simple, fast and selective analysis of DNB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available