4.5 Article

Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from CO2 and CH3OH Using 0.4 nm Molecular Sieve Supported Cu-Ni Bimetal Catalyst

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 906-913

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1004-9541(12)60417-0

Keywords

molecular sieve; Cu-Ni bimetal catalysis; dimethyl carbonate; carbon dioxide; methanol

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2008AA03Z3472294, 2009AA302410]
  2. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  3. Guangdong Province Sci Tech Bureau [2006B12401006, 2008A080800024]
  4. Chinese Universities Basic Research Founding
  5. National University of Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 0.4 nm molecular sieve supported Cu-Ni bimetal catalysts for direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO2 and CH3OH were prepared and investigated. The synthesized catalysts were fully characterized by BET, XRD (X-ray diffraction), TPR (temperature programmed reduction), IR (infra-red adsorption), NH3-TPD (temperature programmed desorption) and CO2-TPD (temperature programmed desorption) techniques. The results showed that the surface area of catalysts decreased with increasing metal content, and the metals as well as Cu-Ni alloy co-existed on the reduced catalyst surface. There existed interaction between metal and carrier, and moreover, metal particles affected obviously the acidity and basicity of carrier. The large amount of basic sites facilitated the activation of methanol to methoxyl species and their subsequent reaction with activated carbon dioxide. The catalysts were evaluated in a continuous tubular fixed-bed micro-gaseous reactor and the catalyst with bimetal loading of 20% (by mass) had best catalytic activities. Under the conditions of 393 K, 1.1 MPa, 5 h and gas space velocity of 510 h(-1), the selectivity and yield of DMC were higher than 86.0% and 5.0%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available