4.6 Article

Robust Hybrid Control for Ballistic Missile Longitudinal Autopilot

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 777-788

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60092-7

Keywords

ballistic missiles; attitude control; gain-scheduling; optimal tuning-control; LQ optimal regulators

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60904066]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB327904]
  3. Weishi Young Teachers Talent Cultivation Foundation of Beihang University [YWF-11-03-Q-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the boost phase's longitudinal autopilot of a ballistic missile equipped with thrust vector control. The existing longitudinal autopilot employs time-invariant passive resistor-inductor-capacitor (RLC) network compensator as a control strategy, which does not take into account the time-varying missile dynamics. This may cause the closed-loop system instability in the presence of large disturbance and dynamics uncertainty. Therefore, the existing controller should be redesigned to achieve more stable vehicle response. In this paper, based on gain-scheduling adaptive control strategy, two different types of optimal controllers are proposed. The first controller is gain-scheduled optimal tuning-proportional-integral-derivative (PID) with actuator constraints, which supplies better response but requires a priori knowledge of the system dynamics. Moreover, the controller has oscillatory response in the presence of dynamic uncertainty. Taking this into account, gain-scheduled optimal linear quadratic (LQ) in conjunction with optimal tuning-compensator offers the greatest scope for controller improvement in the presence of dynamic uncertainty and large disturbance. The latter controller is tested through various scenarios for the validated nonlinear dynamic flight model of the real ballistic missile system with autopilot exposed to external disturbances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available