4.7 Article

Prognostic Relevance of Pulmonary Arterial Compliance in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Journal

CHEST
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages 1064-1070

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1510

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Reduced pulmonary arterial compliance (Ca) is a marker of poor prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that pulmonary arterial Ca could be a predictor of outcome in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods: We enrolled 306 patients with CHF due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction (sLVD) who underwent a clinically driven right-sided heart catheterization. Pulmonary arterial Ca was measured by the ratio between stroke volume and pulse pressure (SV/PP). The primary end point was cardiovascular death; secondary end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation, and appropriately detected and treated episode of ventricular fibrillation. Results: An inverse relationship was observed between SV/PP and pulmonary vascular resistance, the mean resistance-compliance product (RC-time) being 0.30 +/- 0.2 s. In patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), 15 mm Hg, the mean RC- time was 0.34 +/- 0.14 s, and in patients with PCWP >= 15 mm Hg it was 0.28 +/- 0.22 s. Eighty-seven patients died in a follow-up period of 50 +/- 32 months. At receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal prognostic cutoff point of SV/PP was 2.15 mL/mm Hg. An elevated (. 2.15) SV/PP was more strongly associated with survival than any other hemodynamic variable; it was associated with poor prognosis both in patients with high (P <.003) and in patients with normal pulmonary vascular resistance (P <.005). Conclusions: Pulmonary arterial Ca is a strong prognostic indicator in patients with CHF with sLVD. Most importantly, its prognostic role is retained in patients with normal pulmonary vascular resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available