4.7 Article

The Expanding Role of Biomarkers in the Assessment of Smoking-Related Parenchymal Lung Diseases

Journal

CHEST
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages 1027-1034

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-1540

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5T32 HL007633-25, HL107165-01, K23 HL087030]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes [R01 HL087122]
  3. ALTANA
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  6. GlaxoSmithKline plc
  7. Stromedix
  8. Inc/Biogen Idec
  9. Synovex Corporation
  10. sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in the field of clinical biomarkers suggest that quantification of serum proteins could play an important role in the diagnosis, classification, prognosis, and treatment response of smoking-related parenchymal lung diseases. COPD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), two common chronic progressive parenchymal lung diseases, share cigarette smoke exposure as a common dominant risk factor for their development. We have recently shown that COPD and interstitial lung disease may represent distinct outcomes of chronic tobacco use, whereas others have demonstrated that both diseases coexist in some individuals. In this perspective, we examine the potential role of peripheral blood biomarkers in predicting which individuals will develop COPD or IPF, as well as their usefulness in tracking disease progression and exacerbations. Additionally, given the current lack of sensitive and effective metrics to determine an individual's response to treatment, we evaluate the potential role of biomarkers as surrogate markers of clinical outcomes. Finally, we examine the possibility that changes in levels of select protein biomarkers can provide mechanistic insight into the common origins and unique individual susceptibilities that lead to the development of smoking-related parenchymal lung diseases. This discussion is framed by a consideration of the properties of ideal biomarkers for different clinical and research purposes and the best uses for those biomarkers that have already been proposed and investigated. CHEST 2012; 142(4):1027-1034

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available