4.7 Article

Elevated Pulmonary Artery Pressure Is a Risk Factor for Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Journal

CHEST
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages 782-787

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-2806

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH HL04243, NIH HL081619, NIH HL087115, NIH HL67771, NIH HL081332]
  2. Craig and Elaine Dobbin Pulmonary Research Fund
  3. Gilead
  4. Actelion
  5. United Therapeutics
  6. Pfizer
  7. Gerson Lehrman

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is often associated with elevations in pulmonary artery pressures. Although primary pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAL!) has been associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD), the role of secondary PAH in mediating PGD risk in patients with IPF is incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PGD among patients with IPF. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of 126 lung transplant procedures performed for IPF between March 2002 and August 2007. The primary outcome was grade 3 PGD at 72 h after lung transplant. The mPAP was measured as the initial reading following insertion of the right-sided heart catheter during lung transplant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding variables. Results: The mPAP for patients with PGD was 38.5 +/- 16.3 mm Hg vs 29.6 +/- 11.5 mm Hg for patients without PGD (mean difference, 8.9 mm Hg [95% CI, 3.6-14.2]; P=.001). The increase in odds of PGD associated with each 10-mm Hg increase in mPAP was 1.64(95% CI, 1.18-2.26;P=.003). In multivariable models, this relationship was independent of confounding by other clinical variables, although the use of cardiopulmonary bypass partially attenuated the relationship. Conclusions: Higher mPAP in patients with IPF is associated with the development of PGD. CHEST 2011;139(4):782-787

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available