4.7 Article

Wrist Actigraphy

Journal

CHEST
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages 1514-1527

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-1872

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging [K23 AG028452]
  2. VA RRD [IIR 1RX000135]
  3. Cedars Sinai Sleep Medicine Fellowship Program
  4. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To record sleep, actigraph devices are worn on the wrist and record movements that can be used to estimate sleep parameters with specialized algorithms in computer software programs. With the recent establishment of a Current Procedural Terminology code for wrist actigraphy, this technology is being used increasingly in clinical settings as actigraphy has the advantage of providing objective information on sleep habits in the patient's natural sleep environment. Actigraphy has been well validated for the estimation of nighttime sleep parameters across age groups, but the validity of the estimation of sleep-onset latency and daytime sleeping is limited. Clinical guidelines and research suggest that wrist actigraphy is particularly useful in the documentation of sleep patterns prior to a multiple sleep latency test, in the evaluation of circadian rhythm sleep disorders, to evaluate treatment outcomes, and as an adjunct to home monitoring of sleep-disordered breathing. Actigraphy has also been well studied in the evaluation of sleep in the context of depression and dementia. Although actigraphy should not be viewed as a substitute for clinical interviews, sleep diaries, or overnight polysomnography when indicated, it can provide useful information about sleep in the natural sleep environment and/or when extended monitoring is clinically indicated. CHEST 2011; 139(6):1514-1527

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available