4.8 Article

Cube-like α-Fe2O3 Supported on Ordered Multimodal Porous Carbon as High Performance Electrode Material for Supercapacitors

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 3102-3111

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201402526

Keywords

carbon; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; glycine; iron oxide; supercapacitors

Funding

  1. NRFgrant [NRF 2010-0029245]
  2. Global Frontier R&D Program at Center for Multiscale Energy System - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2011-0031571]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [10Z20130012349, 2010-0029245, 2011-0031571] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Well-dispersed cube-like iron oxide (-Fe2O3) nanoparticles (NPs) supported on ordered multimodal porous carbon (OMPC) are synthesized for the first time by a facile and efficient glycine-assisted hydrothermal route. The effect of OPMC support on growth and formation mechanism of the Fe2O3 NPs is discussed. OMPC as a supporting material plays a pivotal role of controlling the shape, size, and dispersion of the Fe2O3 NPs. As-synthesized -Fe2O3/OMPC composites reveal significant improvement in the performance as electrode material for supercapacitors. Compared to the bare Fe2O3 and OMPC, the composite exhibits excellent cycling stability, rate capability, and enhanced specific capacitances of 294Fg(-1) at 1.5Ag(-1), which is twice that of OMPC (145Fg(-1)) and about four times higher than that of bare Fe2O3 (85Fg(-1)). The improved electrochemical performance of the composite can be attributed to the well-defined structure, high conductivity, and hierarchical porosity of OMPC as well as the unique -Fe2O3 NPs with cube-like morphology well-anchored on the OMPC support, which makes the composite a promising candidate for supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available