4.8 Review

Cascade Reactions Catalyzed by Metal Organic Frameworks

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 2392-2410

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201402148

Keywords

cascade/tandem reactions; coupling; heterogeneous catalysis; metal-organic frameworks; sustainable chemistry

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2012-32315]
  3. Generalidad Valenciana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cascade or tandem reactions where two or more individual reactions are carried out in one pot constitute a clear example of process intensification, targeting the maximization of spatial and temporal productivity with mobilization of minimum resources. In the case of catalytic reactions, cascade processes require bi-/multifunctional catalysts that contain different classes of active sites. Herein, we show that the features and properties of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) make these solids very appropriate materials for the development of catalysts for cascade reactions. Due to composition and structure, MOFs can incorporate different types of sites at the metal nodes, organic linkers, or at the empty internal pores, allowing the flexible design and synthesis of multifunctional catalysts. After some introductory sections on the relevance of cascade reactions from the point of view of competitiveness, sustainability, and environmental friendliness, the main part of the text provides a comprehensive review of the literature reporting the use of MOFs as heterogeneous catalysts for cascade reactions including those that combine in different ways acid/base, oxidation/reduction, and metal-organic centers. The final section summarizes the current state of the art, indicating that the development of a first commercial synthesis of a high-added-value fine chemical will be a crucial milestone in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available