4.7 Article

Estimation of groundwater recharge and drought severity with varying model complexity

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 527, Issue -, Pages 844-857

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.025

Keywords

Groundwater recharge; Lysimeter; Model comparison; Drought; Soil water balance; Conceptual model

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_129735, 200020_143688]
  2. Competence Center Environment and Sustainability (CCES) of the ETH domain in the framework of the RECORD
  3. RECORD Catchment projects
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_129735, 200020_143688] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A reliable quantification of groundwater recharge (GR) is essential for sustainable water resources management. This can be particularly relevant in regions where an increase in the duration and frequency of drought events is predicted due to future climate change. Although there exists a large variety of GR estimation methods, their results can differ considerably for an individual site due to the spatio-temporal scales and complexities they represent. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the potential range of GR estimates to allow for consistency and objective inter-comparison of modeling results among different sites. The current study systematically assesses the performance of six frequently used GR estimation methods, which differ in terms of their underlying conceptual framework and complexity. These methods utilize experimental data (lysimeter, river streamflow, groundwater-table variations) as well as soil-water-balance and physically-based modeling concepts. 13 years of hydro-climatic data were analyzed from the Swiss Rietholzbach research catchment for different temporal resolutions and extreme climatic conditions (i.e., dry periods). The major limitations and strengths of the six GR estimation methods were identified and summarized in a comprehensive overview, which will facilitate the selection of an adequate technique for the estimation of GR in future studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available