4.7 Article

Influence of hysteresis on groundwater wave dynamics in an unconfined aquifer with a sloping boundary

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 531, Issue -, Pages 1114-1121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.020

Keywords

Hysteresis; Groundwater waves; Unsaturated flow; Seepage face; Richards equation

Funding

  1. Griffith University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUIPRS)
  2. Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUPRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the influence of hysteresis on water table dynamics in an unconfined aquifer was examined using a numerical model to solve Richards' unsaturated flow equation. The model was subject to simple harmonic forcing across a sloping boundary with a seepage face boundary condition. Time series from both hysteretic and non-hysteretic models were subject to harmonic analysis to extract the amplitude and phase profiles for comparison with existing sand flume data (Cartwright et al., 2004). The results from both model types show good agreement with the data indicating no influence of hysteresis at the oscillation period examined (T = 348 s). The models were then used to perform a parametric study to examine the relationship between oscillation period and hysteresis effects with periods ranging from 3 min to 180 min. At short oscillation periods, (T approximate to 180 s) the effects of hysteresis were negligible with both models providing similar results. As the oscillation period increased, the hysteretic model showed less amplitude damping than the non-hysteretic model. For periods greater than T = 60 min, the phase lag in the non-hysteretic model is greater than for the hysteretic one. For periods less than T = 60 min this trend is reversed and the hysteretic model produced a greater phase lag than the non-hysteretic model. These findings suggest that consideration of hysteresis dynamics in Richards' equation models has no influence on water table wave dispersion for short period forcing such as waves (T approximate to 10 s) whereas for long period forcing such as tides (T approximate to 12.25 h) or storm surges (T approximate to days) hysteresis dynamics should be taken into account. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available