4.5 Article

Tuning Quantum-Dot Organization in Liquid Crystals for Robust Photonic Applications

Journal

CHEMPHYSCHEM
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1413-1421

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201301007

Keywords

fluorescence; ligand exchange; liquid crystals; photoluminescence; quantum dots

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 0852791, DMR 1056860]
  2. University of California, Merced, Energy Research Institute (UC MERI)
  3. UC Merced Graduate and Research Council Faculty Award
  4. NSF-COINS program (via UC Berkeley) [0832819]
  5. UC President's Dissertation Year Fellowship
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1056860] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesogenic ligands have the potential to provide control over the dispersion and stabilization of nanoparticles in liquid crystal (LC) phases. The creation of such hybrid materials is an important goal for the creation of soft tunable photonic devices, such as the LC laser. Herein, we present a comparison of isotropic and mesogenic ligands attached to the surface of CdSe (core-only) and CdSe/ZnS (core/shell) quantum dots (QDs). The mesogenic ligands flexible arm structure enhances ligand alignment, with the local LC director promoting QD dispersion in the isotropic and nematic phases. To characterize QD dispersion on different length scales, we apply fluorescence microscopy, X-ray scattering, and scanning confocal photoluminescent imaging. These combined techniques demonstrate that the LC-modified QDs do not aggregate into the dense clusters observed for dots with simple isotropic ligands when dispersed in liquid crystal, but loosely associate in a fluid-like droplet with an average interparticle spacing >10 nm. Embedding the QDs in a cholesteric cavity, we observe comparable coupling effects to those reported for more closely packed isotropic ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available