4.5 Article

Size-, Shape- and Composition-Dependent Alloying Ability of Bimetallic Nanoparticles

Journal

CHEMPHYSCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 1317-1324

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100001

Keywords

alloys; enthalpy of formation; nanoparticles; size and shape effects; thermodynamics

Funding

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0574]
  2. Central South University
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [200801344]
  4. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [09JJ3106]
  5. Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the surface-area-difference model, the formation enthalpies and the formation Gibbs free energies of bimetallic nanoparticles are calculated by considering size and shape effects. Composition-critical size diagrams were graphed for bulk immiscible bimetallic nanoparticles with the developed model. The results reveal that both the formation enthalpy and formation Gibbs free energy decrease with the decrease of particle size. The effect of rising temperature is similar to the diminishing of particle size on reducing the formation Gibbs free energy. Contrary to the positive formation enthalpy of the bulk immiscible system, a negative formation enthalpy is obtained when the particles are smaller than a critical size. With the decrease of size, the alloying process first takes place in the dilute solute regions, then broadens to the dense solute regions and finally, particles with all compositions can be alloyed. The composition-critical size diagram is classified into three regions by the critical size curves with shape factors of 1 and 1.49, that is, the non-alloying region, alloying region and possible alloying region. The model predictions correspond well with experimental evidences and computer simulation results for Cu-Ag, Au-Ni, Ag-Pt and Au-Pt systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available