4.5 Article

Unraveling Gold(I)-Specific Action Towards Peptidic Disulfide Cleavage: A DFT Investigation

Journal

CHEMPHYSCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages 2596-2603

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100336

Keywords

density functional calculations; disulfide cleavage; gold; mass spectrometry; peptides

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ground-state disulfide dissociation is a target of prime importance in structural biochemistry. A main difficulty consists in avoiding competition with carbon-sulfur and backbone scission pathways. In tandem mass spectrometry, such selectivity is afforded using transition elements or coinage-metal ions as catalyst. Yet, the underlying gas-phase mechanistic details remain poorly understood. Gold(I)-assisted disulfide cleavage is investigated by means of DFT calculations, to elucidate the highly selective and specific catalytic action of this transition-metal cation, a most promising one in tandem mass spectrometry. The preferential cleavage of sulfur-sulfur versus carbon-sulfur linkages on dimethyldisulfide, taken as a prototypical aliphatic compound, is rationalized on the basis of molecular orbital arguments. Secondly, it is revealed that the disulfide dissociation profile is dramatically impacted by a peptidic environment. Calculations on l, l-cystine derivatives show two main factors: the topological frustration for an embedded -CH(2)-S-S-CH(2)-motif induces a 5 kcal mol(-1) penalty, whereas electrophilic assistance via complexation of nitrogen and oxygen atoms lowers activation barriers by a factor of 3. S-S weakening is both thermodynamically and kinetically driven by the versatile coordination mode of gold(I). The influence of amine-terminus group protonation is finally sketched: it gives rise to an intermediate reactivity. This study sheds lights on the key action of the peptidic environment in tuning the dissociation profile in the presence of this transition-metal monocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available