4.2 Article

embB306 Mutations as Molecular Indicators to Predict Ethambutol Susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Journal

CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 358-363

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000343474

Keywords

Antituberculosis drugs; Borderline resistance; Tuberculosis therapy; Mutations; Drug resistance

Funding

  1. Bundesamt fur Gesundheit (BAG), Bern, Switzerland
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  3. Medical Research Council of South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Discordant results in conventional susceptibility testing of ethambutol against Mycobacterium tuberculosis may lead to underreporting of drug resistance. Methods: A 240-bp region of the embB gene in 111 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis was sequenced and examined for mutations linked to ethambutol resistance. The phenotypic susceptibility levels of the isolates were quantified by the BACTEC (TM) MGIT 960 (TM) TB System and correlated with the genotypic test results. These data were analyzed to find information that could be used to clarify discordant ethambutol susceptibility test results. Results: Mutations M306I (n = 56), M306V (n = 18) and M306L (n = 3) in M. tuberculosis showed decreased susceptibility to ethambutol. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in 73% (56/77) of embB306 mutants were at or just above the critical concentration (MICs, 5.0 to <= 12.5 mu g/ml) of ethambutol reflecting borderline (or intermediate) resistance. Eight ethambutol-resistant isolates lacked embB mutations, probably due to mutational alterations elsewhere in the genome. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinical isolates containing embB306 mutations with MICs overlapping the critical concentration are associated with discordant ethambutol susceptibility test results. The clinical significance of borderline resistance in combination treatment of tuberculosis remains to be determined before alternative ethambutol breakpoints are considered. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available