4.7 Article

QSAR as a random event: Modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 31-37

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.012

Keywords

Nanoparticle; QSAR; CORAL software; Optimal descriptor

Funding

  1. EC project NANOPUZZLES [309837]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF/CREST HRD-0833178]
  3. National Science Foundation (EPSCoR Award) [362492-190200-01/NSFEPS-090378]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative structure-property/activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs) are a tool to predict various endpoints for various substances. The classic QSPR/QSAR analysis is based on the representation of the molecular structure by the molecular graph. However, simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) gradually becomes most popular representation of the molecular structure in the databases available on the Internet. Under such circumstances, the development of molecular descriptors calculated directly from SMILES becomes attractive alternative to classic descriptors. The CORAL software (http://www.insilico.eu/coral) is provider of SMILES-based optimal molecular descriptors which are aimed to correlate with various endpoints. We analyzed data set on nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 pancreatic cancer cells. The data set includes 109 nanoparticles with the same core but different surface modifiers (small organic molecules). The concept of a QSAR as a random event is suggested in opposition to classic QSARs which are based on the only one distribution of available data into the training and the validation sets. In other words, five random splits into the visible training set and the invisible validation set were examined. The SMILES-based optimal descriptors (obtained by the Monte Carlo technique) for these splits are calculated with the CORAL software. The statistical quality of all these models is good. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available